This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the crossgcc project.
See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Using the mentioned gcc for building newlib 1.13.0 shows a bloated stack frame in _vfprintf_r of about 1700 Bytes. Using gcc 3.2 to do the same thing results in a stack frame of about 520 Bytes. The 3.4.3 (binary for cygwin from gnuarm.org) looks like a bad choice for low memory and small stacks, though only this obvious for the '_vfprintf_r' newlib function. Does someone know how different versions of gcc behave for this ? Raymund Hofmann ------ Want more information? See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/ Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |