This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the crossgcc project.
See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Tue, 1 Feb 2005 19:12:16 +0200, Bora Þahin <bora.sahin@ttnet.net.tr> wrote: > Hi, > > Grant> Yes; otherwise how would Linux binaries be portable between different > Grant> boards with the same architecture? > > In your reply to me, > "You probably do NOT need to use your special kernel unless you've changed the syscall interfaces." > as you are using 'NOT' with capital letters, I thought as if you were emphasizing something > different or special. > > But this also mean that specially patched kernel can be used also for kernel headers. Because there > is no syscall change. This confused my mind. > That is right. You can use any kernel version when building your toolchain. Your patched kernel source is just as good as the official kernel source for your purposes. I apologize for any confusion. ------ Want more information? See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/ Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |