This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the crossgcc project.

See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: hidden symbol `__divsf3'

From: Mike Frysinger <vapier at gentoo dot org>
To: crossgcc at sources dot redhat dot com
Cc: Manfred Gruber <gruber dot m at utanet dot at>,ptxdist at pengutronix dot de
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2005 11:00:03 -0500
Subject: Re: hidden symbol `__divsf3'
Organization: wh0rd.org
References: <200503141132.33738.gruber.m@utanet.at> <200503141401.16294.gruber.m@utanet.at>

On Monday 14 March 2005 08:01 am, Manfred Gruber wrote:
> solved it with adding: -lgcc_s when building shared libs.
> Is this correct ?

it depends on your definition of 'correct' :)

i think this is born from the binutils' --as-needed support ... previous 
versions of gcc on arm would always force -lgcc_s when building shared 
objects, but with newer binutils, gcc & binutils are supposed to link in 
-lgcc_s only 'as needed' ...

one hack around this i use is to just go back to the old behavior of forcing 
-lgcc_s on all shared objects via gcc's spec file ... not the best solution 
by far, but it works
-mike

------
Want more information?  See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/
Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com

Follow-Ups:
- Re: hidden symbol `__divsf3'
  - From: Manfred Gruber

References:
- hidden symbol `__divsf3'
  - From: Manfred Gruber
- Re: hidden symbol `__divsf3'
  - From: Manfred Gruber

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]