This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the crossgcc project.
See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Sat, 2 Apr 2005, Arno Schuring wrote: > > > Right. The sanitized headers should somehow replace the Linux > > > kernel source altogether. I haven't worked out how, but it > > > ought to be an easy-ish swap. > > well, since it's been a while since i've messed with crosstool, > > i'll let someone else point me in the direction of how to do this. > > at the moment, i've got all the parts set up, ready to go. > > > > gcc-4.1-20050327 > > glibc-2.3.4 > > binutils-2.15.96 > > linux-2.6.11.6 > > The linux-libc-headers package gives you a subdirectory tree > containing (among others): > > include/linux > include/asm-$ARCH > include/scsi > > You should copy at least the linux/ subdir into where gcc expects to > find its headers (preferably $SYS-ROOT/usr/include) and copy > asm-$ARCH to include/asm. So far, I have never needed the other > subdirectories. oh, i didn't realize that. so, from the perspective of a config file, i can just install those sanitized headers relative to where they'd normally be found relative to ${GCC_DIR} and things should work? cool. i'll give that a shot this morning. *then* i'll go back and figure out what means "sanitized". :-) rday ------ Want more information? See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/ Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |