This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the crossgcc project.
See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Monday 11 April 2005 12:00 am, Ryan.Oliver@pha.com.au wrote: > Mike Frysinger wrote: > >for example, i simply do: > >- unpack binutils & configure for -linux target & make install > >- unpack gcc & configure for -linux target w/out headers & make > >install > >-mike > > This works with a gcc build if you use --disable-shared and use > --disable-threads, there should be no need for libc or its headers > in this situation (only a static libgcc is created, and it wont go > hunting for pthread headers). this is how i bootstrap myself up ... the stage1 gcc i build without headers, threads, or shared ... that allows me to build glibc and then build a full stage2 gcc (threads,shared,C++,etc...) ... > This would be fine I suppose for building a linuxthreads glibc with, > but would be useless if you wanted to build an nptl glibc. how come ? ive *compiled* a nptl glibc with this process but i havent tested it too heavily ... also, this would be fine for just say a kernel crosscompiler right ? > Also my experience on mips so far generating gcc in the absence of > glibc headers is that you cannot use a sys-root, for some reason > it trips up... ive been avoiding sys-root so far because it seems to require more things to be setup ahead of time than just the headers configure option -mike ------ Want more information? See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/ Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |