This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the crossgcc project.
See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Mike Frysinger wrote: >On Monday 11 April 2005 12:00 am, Ryan.Oliver@pha.com.au wrote: >> This would be fine I suppose for building a linuxthreads glibc >with, >> but would be useless if you wanted to build an nptl glibc. > >how come ? ive *compiled* a nptl glibc with this process but i >havent tested >it too heavily ... Interesting, I'll have to have a try... I thought you required a gcc with thread support to build glibc w nptl... >also, this would be fine for just say a kernel crosscompiler right ? It should be, the kernel is self contained, by rights it shouldn't need anything else > >> Also my experience on mips so far generating gcc in the absence of >> glibc headers is that you cannot use a sys-root, for some reason >> it trips up... > >ive been avoiding sys-root so far because it seems to require more >things to >be setup ahead of time than just the headers configure option One interesting bug I've noticed so far with sysroot and mips, cross building flex barfs out with a sys-rooted cross-toolchain due to x86 assembler being passed to gas if any optimisation is set (assembler generated is fine without optimisation) Funnily enough this behaviour does not occur with a non-sysrooted cross-toolchain... still looking into what triggers this... Regards Ryan ------ Want more information? See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/ Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |