This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the crossgcc project.
See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
The build matrix at http://kegel.com/crosstool/crosstool-0.31/buildlogs/ shows some problems with mips and gcc-3.4, but it could also just problems with mips and glibc-2.3.3 and higher; glibc-2.3.2 wasn't tested.
Or is Arno referring to some other source of informtion?
Actually, I did a build with : gcc 3.4.1 glibc 2.3.2 binutils 2.15.94.0.2.2
This has worked for us for both kernel 2.4.18 & 2.6.11. (I had to backport some small items to 2.4.18, but they were nto major items. The major one was the compiler.h file.)
Cool. Clearly, I need to add gcc-3.4.x/glibc-2.3.2 back to the build matrix.
Are the 2.4.18 patches anything you'd like to contribute to crosstool, in the interest of expanding the build matrix?
Also, any particular reason you used binutils 2.15.94.0.2.2 other than 'its the latest'? I do see a bunch of good properties in the release notes http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/devel/binutils/release.binutils-2.15.94.0.2.2, but am curious what made you try it. - Dan
-- Trying to get a job as a c++ developer? See http://kegel.com/academy/getting-hired.html
------ Want more information? See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/ Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |