This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sourceware.org mailing list for the crossgcc project.
See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Saturday 13 August 2005 12:44 am, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On Fri, 2005-08-12 at 21:16 -0700, Dan Kegel wrote: > > Mike Frysinger wrote: > > >>Have you read the last paragraph of > > >>http://kegel.com/crosstool/crosstool-0.38/doc/crosstool-howto.html#cana > > >>dian which mentions you need to edit the resulting spec file? > > > > > > heh, that fixed the issue on my end ... `gcc -print-search-dirs` now > > > includes /usr/lib and /lib ... > > > > > > what about gcc-4.x then ? iirc, they're getting away from external > > > spec's, so this wont be fixable in the same way right ? > > > > Oy, oy, oy. > > > > I guess it'll take a little looking at the code to see > > where it gets the value from now, and fix it there instead. > > Anyone feel like looking? (Or asking the experts?) > > Basically, nothing has changed with gcc-4.x. The only real difference is > the former "default spec file" now is implicitly inside of gcc. > Functionally it is still there. > > You can retrieve it with gcc -dumpspecs, you can still install an > explicit spec-file, and you still can override values with spec file > fragments. ah, very good to hear info that has real basis, thanks :) -mike ------ Want more information? See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/ Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |