This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sourceware.org mailing list for the crossgcc project.
See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Sat, 10 Sep 2005, Dan Kegel wrote:
Robert P. J. Day wrote:
credit where credit is due, it was a private e-mail from michael that pointed me at the appropriate architecture makefile as the source for some unwanted compiler options when trying to run the *native* compiler.
How about posting a patch to fix the kernel sources, now that you've found the problem?
but, again, is this really the direction you want to take?
it could conceivably require one patch per architecture, whereas the sanitized headers seem like such a simpler and safer solution. and patching the kernel source might not be a one-time thing as some future feature might screw up the build process yet again. why take the chance?
I'm proposing that you really fix the kernel Makefile, for real, and submit the patch, for real. - Dan
-- Trying to get a job as a c++ developer? See http://kegel.com/academy/getting-hired.html
------ Want more information? See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/ Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |