RE: crosstool bloat

["Dave Korn" <dave dot korn at artimi dot com>]

----Original Message----
>From: David Karlton
>Sent: 22 September 2005 21:01

> Dave Korn wrote:
>> ----Original Message----
>> 
>>> From: David Karlton
>>> Sent: 22 September 2005 15:04
>> 
>> 
>>> Dave Korn wrote:
>>> 
>>>> ----Original Message----

>>> Still have the bloat issue, but I *was* able to build the toolchain on
>>> Fedora now (the issue with the glibc-2.3.2 configure script complaining
>>> that my gcc 4.0.0 compiler was not acceptable).

>>   Try this patch: 

> 
> FIXED.
> 
> No more 60k bloat.
> 

  Hmm.  Over on the binutils list I'm talking to Maciej who is using gcc
4.0.1 and binutils 2.16.1, and he hasn't been experiencing the problem at
all, and his PHDRS output looks much healthier than yours has been.  Can you
show me what output you get when you rebuild that hello-world example adding
the "-v" flag to the gcc command line?  I want to compare linker options.



    cheers,
      DaveK
-- 
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....


------
Want more information?  See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/
Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com