This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sourceware.org mailing list for the crossgcc project.
See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Wed, 28 Sep 2005, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > On Wed, 28 Sep 2005, Lennert Buytenhek wrote: > > > On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 11:55:26AM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > > > > brand new gcc-4.0.2 and, from cursory examination of the patches > > > from gcc-4.0.1 and the source code, it looks like: > > > > > > fix-fixincl.patch Carry forward > > > pr20815-fix.patch Carry forward > > > pr21951-fix2.patch Drop > > > > As well as the arm bigendian patch, most likely. > > hmmm ... the arm bigendian patch is associated with gcc-4.0.0 but > not with gcc-4.0.1 in crosstool-0.38, which is why i never listed > it. was it overlooked for inclusion in gcc-4.0.1? you're right, it appears that the gcc-4.0.0 arm bigendian patch is still needed for gcc-4.0.2, as it is for gcc-4.0.1 as well (just based on eyeballing the patch and source file.) i guess no one ever exercised gcc-4.0.1 with respect to that patch to notice it was missing. rday p.s. the build using gcc-4.0.2 finished using the above two patches and tells me it successfully compiled the test program for SH3. ------ Want more information? See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/ Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |