This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sourceware.org mailing list for the crossgcc project.
See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Fri, 28 Oct 2005, Dave Korn wrote: > Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > "the compiler must support C cleanup handling"? a quick google > > session brings me to this: > > > > > http://dev.gentoo.org/~halcy0n/glibc/patches/5070_all_cross-compile-nptl.patch > > > > a quick recursive grep of the entire patches directory shows no > > patch that refers to "libc_cv_c_cleanup" so i'm initially assuming > > that there is no patch to handle this yet. > > > > time for more research. thoughts? is that gentoo patch a candidate > > for fixing this? mike? > > Well, what version of the compiler are you using? Does it support cleanup > handling or not? Maybe you need a more recent gcc. that's not physically possible. :-) seriously, this whole experiment has been to see if i can build a toolchain with the absolute latest snapshots of the GNU software, to identify what has to change in the build process under those circumstances. aside: that nptl patch above did indeed fix the "cleanup" error. yee ha. now i can see how much further i can get. rday p.s. given that i'm still unclear on the various thread-related configure options, i'm still looking for what to say to make sure that the installation of the glibc headers installs "pthread.h" along with everything else. ------ Want more information? See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/ Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |