This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sourceware.org mailing list for the crossgcc project.

See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: is that "install glibc headers" step in crosstool necessary?

From: Mike Frysinger <vapier at gentoo dot org>
To: crossgcc at sourceware dot org
Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2005 05:21:48 -0500
Subject: Re: is that "install glibc headers" step in crosstool necessary?
References: <Pine.LNX.4.63.0511020633250.19258@localhost.localdomain> <20051103103532.GA5796@tigers-lfs.nsw.bigpond.net.au>

On Thursday 03 November 2005 05:35 am, Greg Schafer wrote:
> I've done the hard
> yards with Google on this topic and the evidence confirms that building
> Glibc based cross-toolchains without the Glibc headers step is just plain
> wrong.


oh, and what if we just want a compiler for a kernel ?  wont this setup:
- binutils
- bootstrap C (no libc headers)
be just fine ?
-mike

------
Want more information?  See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/
Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com

Follow-Ups:
- Re: is that "install glibc headers" step in crosstool necessary?
  - From: Dan Kegel

References:
- is that "install glibc headers" step in crosstool necessary?
  - From: Robert P. J. Day
- Re: is that "install glibc headers" step in crosstool necessary?
  - From: Greg Schafer

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]