This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sourceware.org mailing list for the crossgcc project.
See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Wed, 22 Feb 2006, Dan Kegel wrote: > On 2/22/06, Robert P. J. Day <rpjday@mindspring.com> wrote: > > is there a reason why there are no NPTL patches incorporated into > > ct-0.40? > > Did you look in contrib? ok, here's the story on NPTL patches. first, one of the patches i was thinking of *is* there, it had just been renamed slightly. that would be this one: glibc-2.3.6/glibc-2.3.5-sh-lowlevellock.patch which *used* to have the phrase "nptl" in its name -- that's why i missed it as i just did a find looking for "*nptl*". my bad. sorry. the other patch i'm thinking of is this one: glibc-5070_all_cross-compile-nptl.patch which i've attached if anyone wants to check it out. it's a patch against glibc/nptl/sysdeps/pthread/configure{,.in} that i pulled out of the gentoo patch repo (based on, i believe, mike frysinger's advice). as i recall, this patch can be applied regardless of whether you're building with linuxthreads or NPTL so it should be there in either case, but i'll defer to others who know much more about this than me. finally, that patch in contrib is a patch against crosstool itself, so it doesn't affect what i've written above. i'm looking at that patch as a totally independent issue. rday
Attachment:
glibc-5070_all_cross-compile-nptl.patch
Description: Text document
------ Want more information? See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/ Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sourceware.org
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |