This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sourceware.org mailing list for the crossgcc project.
See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Wed, 22 Feb 2006, Dan Kegel wrote: > On 2/22/06, Robert P. J. Day <rpjday@mindspring.com> wrote: > > glibc-2.3.6/glibc-2.3.5-sh-lowlevellock.patch > > gee, looks like that should be in patches/glibc-2.3.5, too. Hrm. yup, i'm pretty sure it does, just based on the name, naturally. it's been a while since i've played with the NPTL stuff so my memory is a bit fuzzy. as you can see, that patch isn't mine, it's kaz's. but yes, you can push a copy back into glibc-2.3.5. > > glibc-5070_all_cross-compile-nptl.patch > > > > which i've attached if anyone wants to check it out. it's a patch > > against glibc/nptl/sysdeps/pthread/configure{,.in} that i pulled > > out of the gentoo patch repo (based on, i believe, mike > > frysinger's advice). > > Minor point about Signed-off-by. In the patch you attached, you > have the line Signed-off-by: and your name, with no other indication > of where the patch came from. That means you're claiming you wrote > it! You have to include info about where the patch came from to be > correct. If you add a signed-off-by, you also have to add the exact > URL you got it from, in this case > http://dev.gentoo.org/~halcy0n/glibc/patches/5070_all_cross-compile-nptl.patch > (Yes, these details matter.) sorry, that attached patch wasn't in the final form that i submitted it in -- i just tacked it onto that recent posting so others could see what i was talking about. my *submitted* form of that patch definitely had its provenance. i can resubmit if you wish. > > as i recall, this patch can be applied regardless of whether > > you're building with linuxthreads or NPTL so it should be there in > > either case, but i'll defer to others who know much more about > > this than me. > > Mike Freysinger claimed it's always safe: > http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A-how-to-implement-conditional-patches--p1795571.html > and I guess he's right, since it only affects NPTL. So, which > patches directory should it go in? i'll check on that and get back to you. i'm guessing glibc-2.3.5 and 2.3.6 at the very least. rday ------ Want more information? See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/ Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sourceware.org
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |