This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sourceware.org mailing list for the crossgcc project.

See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: EABI arm linux gcc 4.1.1 test result

From: "Bridge Wu" <mingqiao dot wu at gmail dot com>
To: "Steven Newbury" <s_j_newbury at yahoo dot co dot uk>
Cc: crossgcc at sourceware dot org, linux-arm-toolchain at lists dot arm dot linux dot org dot uk
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 12:46:07 +0800
Subject: Re: EABI arm linux gcc 4.1.1 test result
References: <246188420608210012t6c4fab62u61229f52901b28ab@mail.gmail.com> <20060828125952.644.qmail@web25003.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>

That's good? I see most test results in testsuite mailing list are
better than mine. All those vector test cases are PASSed in those
testresults. I found some test cases are PASSed if -mabi=aapcs-linux
is used, such as switch4.C and compat.exp.

I don't know if the arm-none-eabi-gcc is "non-linux", it's downloaded
from Codesourcery website. I don't know if I use improper option to
run testsuite or just the tool chain itself is built improperly.

On 8/28/06, Steven Newbury <s_j_newbury@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:

Sorry, no not yet.  I've been really busy just lately and I'm away from home at
the moment.
That's good I guess! :-P
The arm-none-eabi-gcc is "non-linux" correct? ie. standalone?


--
best regards,
-Bridge

--
For unsubscribe information see http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faq

Follow-Ups:
- Re: EABI arm linux gcc 4.1.1 test result
  - From: Steven Newbury

References:
- Re: EABI arm linux gcc 4.1.1 test result
  - From: Bridge Wu
- Re: EABI arm linux gcc 4.1.1 test result
  - From: Steven Newbury

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]