This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sourceware.org mailing list for the crossgcc project.
See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Toralf Lund wrote:OK
Won't that install the wrong type of binary? (See my original post.)You can just get this as a side effect of building your standard cross-binutils instead of an extra step by adding --enable-install-libbfd to the toplevel configure.
You're right, that will give you a host-libbfd and you want a
target-libbfd. I scanned too fast.
I think the reason that you are having trouble installing just libbfdYeah, I suppose you are right.
from a binutils tree is that it was never designed to be a standalone
library, only for consumption by projects in the 'src' tree, i.e. gdb,
binutils, sim, etc. It isn't maintained with a stable interface, or
versioned at all.
I'm rather surprised that a third party project usesIt's the "mpatrol" library. I wanted to be able to link my application with this in order to track down some (suspected) memory errors. Or actually, I wanted "dmalloc", but had some problems building it, and based on something I read on the web, I thought those would be very hard to sort out. So I turned to mpatrol. And I successfully built it, too, but then I found that it was not so hard to get dmalloc up and running after all...
it without providing their own in-tree copy of it, given this interface
instability. I would expect a lot of trouble with version conflicts if
they expect you to just drop in some libbfd of unspecified date.
-- For unsubscribe information see http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faq
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |