Re: [crosstool-NG] Design discussion

[Stefan Hallas Andersen <stefande at cisco dot com>]

Hi Rob & All,

Don't get me wrong - I'm perfectly fine with you voicing your oppinion
just like I'm entitled to mine. This is an open forum and everybody can
chime in, right ?

1) Sure, but the subject line does say [crosstool-NG] Design discussion,
but let's leave it here.
2) Okay - and I appreciate yours just like anyone else.
3) I hope not - but thank you for pointing that out. As an author of a
tool in the same category I'd consider your points more valuable if you
wouldn't reference your own solution but just stick to pointing out the
actual problems with the solution at hand. Not that what you're saying
is necessarily wrong ; but let's discuss the problems before we do the
solutions.

Best regards,
Stefan Hallas Andersen
Cisco Systems Inc.

On Mon, 2009-04-06 at 20:06 -0700, Rob Landley wrote:
> On Monday 06 April 2009 19:11:50 Stefan Hallas Andersen wrote:
> > Hi Rob and All,
> >
> > It sounds to me like you're problem with crosstool-ng is that it
> isn't
> > firmware-linux and you're now using the crosstool-ng mailing list to
> > promote your own design and tool.
> 
> 1) Actually this is the crossgcc mailing list, it's not specific to
> crosstool-ng.  (This list dates back to 1997.)
> 
> 2) I was asked for my opinion.
> 
> 3) That's honestly not my intent.
> 
> > Where this not supposed to be a crosstool-ng design discussion
> thread
> > instead of a >> who can write the longest emails competition << ?
> 
> I've so far replied to about the first 1/3 of Yann's first email.
> 
> We can take this back off-list if it's annoying you,
> 
> Rob
> --
> GPLv3 is to GPLv2 what Attack of the Clones is to The Empire Strikes
> Back.
> 
> 

--
For unsubscribe information see http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faq