This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sourceware.org mailing list for the crossgcc project.

See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: crosstool-ng: cross compiler for -mach=arm4vt (Cirrus Logic EP93xx target)

Martin Guy wrote:
On 9/9/09, H Hartley Sweeten <hartleys@visionengravers.com> wrote: 
 >> I used arm920t instead of ep9312 but I believe ep9312 is just an alias.
 > for arm920t, yes. It also passes "armv4t+maverick" to the assembler
So with "arm920t" does the assembler work ok for the ep93xx or should it
 be "ep9312"?


Yes, arm920t is fine. Just pretend the maverick isn't there. :)
You only need ep9312 if you include maverick assembler fragments or
are using my fixed GCCs for Maverick
http://martinwguy.co.uk/martin/crunch
I got back to "no known bugs" in this stuff again three days ago, so
if you have FP-intensive stuff to run it might be worth trying.

M


Thanks for that link , and all your efforts to knock some sensible ARM code out of GCC . Kudos.

I see you're posting patch sets for 4.2 and 4.3. I recall you said somewhere that 4.2.x produced faster ARM code. Is that still your experience?

best regards, Peter.



--
For unsubscribe information see http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faq

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]