This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sourceware.org mailing list for the crossgcc project.

See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: statically linked replacement for cygpath - anyone got such a beast?

From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please at gnu dot org>
To: "'crossgcc at sourceware dot org'" <crossgcc at sourceware dot org>, "Motta, Frank" <Frank dot Motta at sonyericsson dot com>
Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2010 16:10:30 -0400
Subject: Re: statically linked replacement for cygpath - anyone got such a beast?
References: <12B0DA0E346F5F4DAB11F715D19DC30E36B8AC54F7@usrtmbx01.corpusers.net>

On Mon, Apr 05, 2010 at 02:50:07PM -0400, Motta, Frank wrote:
>I have a new challenge that is related to cross building and the 'best'
>solution I have is cygpath.  However, we aren't shipping cygwin (not a
>subject for discussion), it will be MinGW.  So, the challenge that I
>have is a replacement for cygpath in all its value (or at least -m, -w,
>and -u options).

If you are not shipping cygwin why would you need cygpath?

It is not likely that you'll find a non-cygwin version of cygpath but if
you did manage to build a static version of cygpath you'd still be under
the GPL and you'd need to make the source code for cygpath and (likely)
cygwin1.dll available to whoever gets the binary.

cgf

--
For unsubscribe information see http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faq

Follow-Ups:
- RE: statically linked replacement for cygpath - anyone got such a beast?
  - From: Motta, Frank

References:
- statically linked replacement for cygpath - anyone got such a beast?
  - From: Motta, Frank

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]