This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sourceware.org mailing list for the crossgcc project.

See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [patch 02/10] Adapt CTPatch function to handle dash in package name

From: Remy Bohmer <linux at bohmer dot net>
To: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann dot morin dot 1998 at anciens dot enib dot fr>
Cc: crossgcc at sourceware dot org, "Bart vdr. Meulen" <bartvdrmeulen at gmail dot com>
Date: Sat, 29 May 2010 23:34:56 +0200
Subject: Re: [patch 02/10] Adapt CTPatch function to handle dash in package name
References: <20100527211809.988512992@bohmer.net> <20100527212131.265538734@bohmer.net> <201005291626.45331.yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>

Hi,

2010/5/29 Yann E. MORIN <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>:
> Remy, All,
>
> On Thursday 27 May 2010 23:18:11 Remy Bohmer wrote:
>> Some packages have a dash ('-') in their package name, other
>> packages have a dash in their version number. In order to handle this
>> first look for a patch directory split on the last dash, in not found
>> check for a patch direcory split on the fist dash.
>
> This should not be needed now, as all callers of CT_Patch pass two args:
> - package base name
> - package version
>
> So CT_Patch no longer has to infer those.

Oops, I did not realise that that change would also fix that problem
in a different manner.
I guess I have to restart the build without this patch, and see if it
works. I will try to test this early next week.
Please ignore this patch for now.

Kind regards,

Remy

--
For unsubscribe information see http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faq

References:
- Re: [patch 02/10] Adapt CTPatch function to handle dash in package name
  - From: Yann E. MORIN

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]