This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sourceware.org mailing list for the crossgcc project.
See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Hi, On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 6:02 PM, Yann E. MORIN <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr> wrote: > Arnaud, All, > > On Tuesday 10 August 2010 06:44:50 Arnaud Lacombe wrote: >> I've been playing with gcc 4.5.1 on sh4, and it failed the following way >> --- libgcc/config/sh/t-linux ? ?2010-08-10 00:20:56.000000000 -0400 >> +++ libgcc/config/sh/t-linux.new ? ? ? ?2010-08-10 00:21:02.000000000 -0400 >> @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ >> ? ? ? ? -Wl,--version-script=@shlib_map_file@ \ >> ? ? ? ? -o @multilib_dir@/@shlib_base_name@.so.1.tmp @multilib_flags@ \ >> - ? ? ? @shlib_objs@ -lc && \ >> + ? ? ? @shlib_objs@ && \ >> ? ? ? ? rm -f @multilib_dir@/@shlib_base_name@.so && \ >> ? ? ? ? if [ -f @multilib_dir@/@shlib_base_name@.so.1 ]; then \ > > I seem to recall there's a similar /fix/ for some other versions as well... > yes, this is `gcc/4.3.2/370-sh-no-libc.patch'. Speaking about that, I'd be interested to have some details about the `cc_core_pass_2' step. There does not seem to be any details about it in docs/. In particular, why do we need libgcc to be built ? The closest answer I can get so far is "Merge the NPTL stuff. [...]", from May 2007, which is... enlightening ;-) Thanks, - Arnaud -- For unsubscribe information see http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faq
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |