This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sourceware.org mailing list for the crossgcc project.

See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH 0 of 3] Add support for using gold instead of ld


Hi,

On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 6:01 PM, Yann E. MORIN
<yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr> wrote:
> Arnaud, Bryan, All,
>
> On Tuesday 28 December 2010 20:31:04 Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>> That said, it would seem that the default linker depends. As I'd
>> understand it so far, gcc maintain its own set of tools in its
>> internal directory structure (the one containing "as", "ld", ...) use
>> them to access the actual linker.
>
> I am not sure I understand this. Are you talking about a combined tree?
> We are not using a combined tree, and gcc does not have the source for
> as, ld gold, or [...] in its tree.
>
> But yet, when we build the 'core' gcc, we copy binutils' tools into the
> core gcc install dir, so that it can find them.
>
no, I was speaking about the final content of
${PREFIX}/${TARGET_TUPLE}/bin, which seem to be a copy of the tools
available in ${PREFIX}/bin.

 - Arnaud

--
For unsubscribe information see http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faq


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]