This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sourceware.org mailing list for the crossgcc project.
See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 12:28 AM, Anthony Foiani <anthony.foiani@gmail.com> wrote: > Bryan -- > > On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 12:25 AM, Bryan Hundven <bryanhundven@gmail.com> wrote: >> Tony, >> >>> Sorry about the duplicate work; I just now saw your mail, right after >>> sending my patch to handle at least part of the same problem. >> >> I like seeing that there is more then one way to fix a problem. > > Heh. > >> Which configuration did you build to need these fixes? > > The latter of the two you mention: powerpc-e500v2-linux-gnuspe > > (On Fedora 14 x86-64, although I don't think it matters quite so much > for this issue, other than the "static libs are a separate package" > problem.) > >> Your change makes me ask: Do we need libstdc++.a for a certain >> configuration? Or for all? > > Unfortunately, I don't know. ÂIt seems that *something* on the host > side wants libstdc++ for static linking; exactly what, I don't recall. > Â(I suppose I can erase that package and recompile, to see what > dies...) > > Interesting; looks like the static lib is a part of -devel for F13 > (and, presumably, earlier), but not on F14. > > Anyway. ÂRunning the experiment now. ÂWill try to update this thread > as I find out what breaks. Â:) Hmm. So Debian and Fedora (<=FC13) have previously packaged libstdc++.a in the dev packages. Maybe this points to all toolchains needing it and we never noticed because it was always installed. Suspicions aren't as good as testing though. >> The only configuration that I have noticed it on so far was this >> powerpc-405-linux-gnu and powerpc-e500v2-linux-gnuspe. I would like to >> try a few more configurations. >> >> If we really need libstdc++.a for all toolchains, then we should add >> it to the configure file. Otherwise, we should warn about it being >> missing for this and/or other affected configurations until a better >> solution can be formed. (bug?) > > Perhaps. ÂAgain, I have to make apologies for the fact that I can only > make patches for items which are show-stoppers for me; I hope that > they're useful to others, but unfortunately I'm not in a position to > do exhaustive fixing. Â:( I think it was rhetorical. I don't know if I can say that if it came down the possible-issue-tree this far that I can honestly say that I _will_ be able to fix the problem, but I will try my best to at least understand it. > Thanks for all the work you've been adding to ct-ng lately! Thanks. > Best regards, > Tony > -Bryan -- For unsubscribe information see http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faq
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |