This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sourceware.org mailing list for the crossgcc project.
See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Thomas, Tobias, AllYou are right, but Yann got the point. Its a different system.
On Thursday 08 March 2012 10:47:26 Thomas Petazzoni wrote:Le Wed, 7 Mar 2012 20:01:04 +0100 (CET), "Tobias Arp"<tobiasarp@web.de> a Ãcrit :
Build=i686-pc-linux-gnu Host=i586-pc-linux-gnu Target=armJust curious: do you really need to use the canadian mechanism to build such a toolchain? If it's just a matter of having i586 binaries instead of i686 binaries, isn't it simpler to just pass -march=i586 to the CFLAGS used when building the host utilities, and therefore do a normal cross-compiler? Or maybe I'm missing something?
But we can close this thread with your help i found my problem... it was a typo in my script...It might probably be a completely different system (eg a different libc version, or even a different libc, and so on...). A tuple is not really enough to differentiate any two systems.
Regards, Yann E. MORIN.
-- For unsubscribe information see http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faq
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |