This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sourceware.org mailing list for the crossgcc project.
See crosstool-NG for lots more information.
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
| Other format: | [Raw text] | |
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 02:06:18PM +1300, Michael Hope wrote:
> On 14 November 2012 13:30, Yann E. MORIN <yann.morin.1998@free.fr> wrote:
> > On Wednesday 14 November 2012 Michael Hope wrote:
> >> It turns out that GCC and the libraries are being built without
> >> optimisation.
...
> --- a/scripts/crosstool-NG.sh.in Fri Nov 09 18:22:31 2012 +0100
> +++ b/scripts/crosstool-NG.sh.in Wed Nov 14 13:48:18 2012 +1300
> @@ -494,7 +494,9 @@
> fi
>
> # Help gcc
> - CT_CFLAGS_FOR_HOST=
> + # Explicitly optimise, else the lines below will overide the
> + # package's default optimisation flags
> + CT_CFLAGS_FOR_HOST="-O2 -g"
> [ "${CT_USE_PIPES}" = "y" ] && CT_CFLAGS_FOR_HOST+=" -pipe"
> CT_CFLAGS_FOR_HOST+=" ${CT_EXTRA_FLAGS_FOR_HOST}"
FWIW, I brought this issue up in February:
http://sourceware.org/ml/crossgcc/2012-02/msg00089.html
I should've sent a patch but it was so easy to just
use CT_EXTRA_FLAGS_FOR_HOST...
Johannes
--
For unsubscribe information see http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faq
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |