Re: Has sys/stat.h changed

[Christopher Faylor <cgf at redhat dot com>]

On Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 09:36:16PM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote:
>Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> 
>> Maybe it is easier to just update gcc rather than 27 different packages
>> which include -I/usr/include/wNNapi, though.
>
>That was my point.  Since with -mwin32 you get /usr/include/wNNapi
>included automatically, it's a non-issue there.  My argument was
>targetted at the need for just one packaqe -- gcc -- to "know" where
>windows.h lived, even for -mno-win32.  As much as the need is personally
>distasteful, since it obscures the "clean" separation between "native"
>and "cygwin".  If there is such a separation. :-P

I really would rather keep the separation but I also have a distaste of
trying to force other projects to change because I made a random change
that affects them.

Gcc does that from time to time.  Their reasons are always technically
sound but that doesn't stop me from grumbling.

In this case, I think that I, or someone, would have to make sure that
sources.redhat.com stuff compiles correctly before I move gcc to a
"non-testing" status.

cgf