This is the mail archive of the
cygwin-apps@cygwin.com
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: accept() failed message on kde 1.1.2 ??
- To: Corinna Vinschen <cygwin-apps at cygwin dot com>
- Subject: Re: accept() failed message on kde 1.1.2 ??
- From: egor duda <deo at logos-m dot ru>
- Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 13:43:12 +0400
- CC: Cygwin-Xfree <cygwin-xfree at sources dot redhat dot com>
- Organization: deo
- References: <7F2B9185F0196F44B59990759B91B1C2505D49@ins-exch.inspirepharm.com><000001c0f577$dec63960$6e032bb7@BRAMSCHE><20010615112802.B4107@cygbert.vinschen.de>
- Reply-To: egor duda <cygwin-apps at cygwin dot com>
Hi!
Friday, 15 June, 2001 Corinna Vinschen cygwin-apps@cygwin.com wrote:
>> > > However, a strace containing a failing accept() would perhaps help.
>> >
>> > Ralf, should be able to send a strace directly to you.
>> > Ralf please do not post strace files to the list :-)
>> >
>> I will try, but the difficulty is that on stracing the error does not
>> occure. I will analyze it in more detail ...
CV> The problem is that we can't see any reason why accept fails.
CV> If it's in fact the Winsock call, we would at least need a
CV> Winsock error code. If it's Egor's additional code we would
CV> see an appropriate message in the strace.
i suppose it may be some kind of race. strace slows program and timing
issues may disappear if program is run under strace.
Ralf, have you tried '-b 65000' option to strace? it adds additional
buffering and speeds things up in some extent. some problems that
disappear when you run a program under strace without this option,
appear back when you add '-b 65000' to strace parameters.
Egor. mailto:deo@logos-m.ru ICQ 5165414 FidoNet 2:5020/496.19