This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Fwd: Re: [Refresh]: patch for C++ parser bug with function attributes
- To: mingw-dvlpr <mingw-dvlpr at lists dot sourceforge dot net>, cygwin-apps <cygwin-apps at cygwin dot com>
- Subject: Fwd: Re: [Refresh]: patch for C++ parser bug with function attributes
- From: Danny Smith <danny_r_smith_2001 at yahoo dot co dot nz>
- Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2001 12:49:50 +1000 (EST)
--- "Joseph S. Myers" <email@example.com> wrote: > Date: Fri, 21 Sep
2001 02:34:52 +0100 (BST)
> From: "Joseph S. Myers" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> To: Danny Smith <email@example.com>
> CC: GCC Patches <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> Subject: Re: [Refresh]: patch for C++ parser bug with function
> On Wed, 5 Sep 2001, Danny Smith wrote:
> > This refreshes Bob Wilson's patch
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2001-01/msg01751.html
> > which I quote:
> > <begin quote>
> > The attached GCC patch fixes a previously reported problem with
> > function
> > attributes (see
> I hope this problem is now fixed on the mainline with my table-driven
> attributes patch. Could you test this?
> If it is fixed, could you produce a minimal testcase for the problem
> (fails before, passes now) that is suitable to go in the GCC
> Joseph S. Myers
Joseph's patch is here:
I will start on this. Any interest in backport to 3.0.1, or should I
just target 3.1? I'm hoping it may solve some of the other attribute
problems (stdcall and dllimport) in C++ classes with 3.0.1.
http://travel.yahoo.com.au - Yahoo! Travel
- Got Itchy feet? Get inspired!