This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: Anyone looking at setup.ini, debugging setup.exe?
- To: <gp at familiehaase dot de>,<cygwin-apps at cygwin dot com>
- Subject: Re: Anyone looking at setup.ini, debugging setup.exe?
- From: "Robert Collins" <robert dot collins at itdomain dot com dot au>
- Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2001 20:53:05 +1000
- References: <3BAC0A3D.2729.3A9C91B7@localhost>
----- Original Message -----
From: "Gerrit P. Haase" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Sent: Saturday, September 22, 2001 11:49 AM
Subject: Re: Anyone looking at setup.ini, debugging setup.exe?
> Christopher Faylor schrieb am 2001-09-21, 12:22:
> >I haven't seen any comments on my setup.ini checkin or on the bug
> >that I think I found in setup.exe.
> >Is anyone looking at these?
> Which is the latest setup.exe version?
> Have not heard of a bug. What is it?
> I have a setup.exe some days old, v2.96. Besides the window is too
> for reading the descriptions and i have to scroll (well i is possible
> scroll but i don't like it), it seems to work.
> (Well i get thousands of errors claiming "parse errors - probably not
> latest setup version...")
Thats definately an error of some sort. Maybe the parser is broken in
> A little bit tricky if there are the packages in one category hidden.
The three radio buttins, prev, curr, exp still apply with categories.
> I get now only the descriptions instead of the package name.
> Maybe the package/program name should be in the first column, then the
> selection, 'src', description?
Something anyway :]. The current code uses description if it's present,
otherwise the name. We have two options: ensure that the package name is
present in the description (ie "mingw-runtime: The run time libraries
for mingw programs") or a popup (move the mouse over, see the details,
or a wider column, or possibly a info area at the bottom of the screen.
I don't like the idea of the columns getting _even_ wider..