This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: Aspell ... (ready?)
- From: Ronald Landheer-Cieslak <blytkerchan at users dot sourceforge dot net>
- To: cygwin-apps at cygwin dot com
- Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2003 17:40:28 +0200
- Subject: Re: Aspell ... (ready?)
- References: <firstname.lastname@example.org> <20030911152028.GV9981@cygbert.vinschen.de> <email@example.com> <20030912113130.GG9981@cygbert.vinschen.de> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <20030912131347.GK3362@linux_rln.harvest> <email@example.com> <20030912151713.GP3362@linux_rln.harvest> <BAY2-DAV50Qez1enAqp00001525@hotmail.com> <20030918144647.GB7208@redhat.com>
On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 10:46:47AM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 13, 2003 at 01:24:20AM +1000, Gareth Pearce wrote:
<snipped the lame ASCII art>
> >inspired by this hat - I ask ... is there anything stoping us doing the
> >coordinated release of the aspell and dictionary this weekend? I was fairly
> >sure that the last available version (which was compiled by rlc not me, but
> >otherwise was perfectly normal) didnt recieve any aditional feedback.
> >Gareth - the not-quite-just-yet owner of the new-but-not-spiffy aspell
> >maintainership hat.
> What was the answer to this question? I've wanted [ai]spell in the
> distribution for a long time and I'm anxious to get something in.
> Are we ready? If so, point me at a URL and I'll download it.
AFAIC, we're ready.
I'll repeat the URLs for the dictionaries:
Gareth pointed to the following URLs in
Gareth says in http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-09/msg00179.html
that there's no need to mark them as test, despite the fact that the gcc
he used is still marked as such. Personally, I'd mark at least aspell-dev
as test, seeing as that contains the files that won't work with the current
gcc, but it's his call (he's the maintainer, after all :)
"No one gets too old to learn a new way of being stupid."