This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
RE: ITP: graphviz and doxygen (seperately)
- From: "Gareth Pearce" <tilps at hotmail dot com>
- To: <cygwin-apps at cygwin dot com>
- Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2003 02:44:32 +1000
- Subject: RE: ITP: graphviz and doxygen (seperately)
> -----Original Message-----
> From: firstname.lastname@example.org [mailto:email@example.com]
> On Behalf Of Jörg Schaible
> Sent: Friday, 26 September 2003 2:33 AM
> To: firstname.lastname@example.org
> Subject: RE: graphviz (and doxygen?)
> Hi Gareth,
> Gareth Pearce wrote on Thursday, September 25, 2003 6:18 PM:
> > Somewhat amusing little bug - the code correctly supports
> > textmode - if the #define had of been in the file with the
> > #ifdef that dependend on it...
> > It appears I have a nice working version, works on
> > text/binary mounts - 'dot' is working with both now too. (I
> > think it was being fed corrupt data
> > before)
> > So shall I package it up?
> sounds great. Personally I would split it up into two separat packages
> (graphviz and doxygen), because Graphviz may be used by other packages or
> applications too and it is only optional to doxygen. Since they are used
> quite often together you may put a dependency for graphviz into the
> doxygen setup.hint file.
Well I was never intending to put them in one - separate original source
tar.gz's files - so putting them together would be crazy.
I am thinking of putting doxygen documentation in a separate package.
I don?t think a dependency is a good idea - if we had suggests - I would,
but until then I'd just leave them separate. Might mention it in any
announcements about said packages.
Was that a vote for graphviz?