RE: doxygen 1.3.5 vs 1.2.18 (?)

["Gareth Pearce" <tilps at hotmail dot com>]

Yes I've been dealing with some personal issues which mean I've done ...
pretty much nothing lately.  No one should feel like they are waiting on me,
it'll probably be a little while before I redo my doxygen package.  If
someone else does it first, that would be great.  And while graphviz got the
votes, there was never a clear decision on the legal status, and I haven?t
yet done the obvious thing and attempted to follow it up with the graphviz
people themselves.

FWIW I did manage to get upstream to patch the doxygen textmode bug, I just
haven?t done anything since then.

Gareth
PS: I realise there is a new version of aspell, and a beta of nano to
consider - I'll get round to looking at them shortly, I hope!

> -----Original Message-----
> From: cygwin-apps-owner@cygwin.com [mailto:cygwin-apps-owner@cygwin.com]
> On Behalf Of Jörg Schaible
> Sent: Wednesday, 21 January 2004 3:15 AM
> To: CygWin-Apps
> Subject: RE: doxygen 1.3.5 vs 1.2.18 (?)
> 
> Lapo Luchini wrote on Tuesday, January 20, 2004 4:26 PM:
> 
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > Hi,
> > I'm just curious about work on a "newer" doxygen package: is
> > it under way? there are reasons not to?
> 
> Original maintainer has been disappeared long ago. Gareth Pearce once
> wanted to take over and sent also an ITP for the related graphviz, but
> I've not heard anything from him about these packages for some months,
> too. So ...
> 
> > of course "I don't
> > have time" and/or "1.3 is not a stable branch" are perfectly good
> > reasons ^_^)
> 
> 
> Regards,
> Jörg