This is the mail archive of the
cygwin-apps
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: [ITP] updated: lighttpd-1.4.8-1 [Was: lighttpd on cygwin?]
- From: Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes <sthoenna at efn dot org>
- To: cygwin-apps at cygwin dot com
- Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 23:06:18 -0800
- Subject: Re: [ITP] updated: lighttpd-1.4.8-1 [Was: lighttpd on cygwin?]
- References: <43C5F933.5060104@versatechs.com>
On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 11:37:39PM -0700, Verse X wrote:
> >Lapo Luchini wrote:
> >
> >> Does this means that it fails to load to you as it conflicts with other
> >> DLLs?
> >
> >Yes, but only in certain cases and situations -- not in general.
> >
> >> Whose fault is it? My ld.exe?
> >
> >No, ld still defaults to --disable-auto-image-base.
> >
> >> Should I add a "rebase" in the building script?
> >
> >No, just "LDFLAGS=-Wl,--enable-auto-image-base ./configure ..." when
> >configuring.
> >
> >Brian
>
> I'm new to this mailing list, and don't undertand what's going on here.
>
> Did Jan send Lapo some source patches, whereup Lapo built a lighttpd
> package,
> which he posted to http://www.lapo.it/cygwin/lighttpd-1.4.8-1.tar.bz2 (etc),
> and which people subsequently have problem using because of "ImageBase
> 10000000"?
>
> And then Brian suggested that Lapo rebuild with some additional linker
> flags?
>
> This is how I sense the conversation went, although I couldn't figure out
> who Christopher is and what he meant by "uploaded".
>
> My interest in this is simple: I would like to have the lastest lighttpd,
> with fastcgi,
> working under Cygwin. Using the tarball from www.lapo.it, I can install it
> successfully,
> but when I tried running it, I get this error ...
>
> 2006-01-11 23:33:19:
> (/home/lapo/packaging/tmp/lighttpd-1.4.8/src/mod_fastcgi.c.1209) ---
> fastcgi spawning
> port: 0
> socket /tmp/lighttpd-socket
> current: 0 / 10
> C:\cygwin\usr\sbin\lighttpd.exe (1072): *** unable to remap
> C:\cygwin\lib\lighttpd\mod_indexfile.dll to same address as
> parent(0x3F0000) != 0x970000
> 9 [main] lighttpd 2224 fork_parent: child 1072 died waiting for dll
> loading
>
> If you guys can get this working, I think a LOT of people will be very
> thankful.
> I know I will :-)
I feel my efforts at watching imagebases in incoming upload requests
have been vindicated now :)