This is the mail archive of the
cygwin-apps
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: [HEADSUP] openssl-1.0.1 vs. openssl 0.9.8
- From: Chris Sutcliffe <ir0nh34d at gmail dot com>
- To: Cygwin-apps <cygwin-apps at cygwin dot com>
- Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2013 07:43:49 -0500
- Subject: Re: [HEADSUP] openssl-1.0.1 vs. openssl 0.9.8
- References: <20130212152108.GA13601@calimero.vinschen.de>
Hi Corinna,
On 12 February 2013 10:21, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> since openssl 1.0.1 is our recent version for a while now, I'd like to
> ask those of you which still have packages linked against libopenssl098
> to update your packages to new versions linked against libopenssl100.
>
> The following packages are affected:
>
> libtorrent11 Chris Sutcliffe
> libtorrent14 Chris Sutcliffe
>
> There isn't much pressure yet, since I'll continue to support the old
> libopenssl098 a while, but if it's not asked too much, it would be nice
> if you could update your packages.
I've been fighting with the latest stable rtorrent / libtorrent (as
have many people - FreeBSD, etc.) as it has a tendency to peg CPUs at
100%. As a result the Cygwin release is lagging behind the upstream
release and is the reason there hasn't been a recent release. I'm
more than happy to rebuild the current release (i.e. libtorrent14)
against the updated libopenssl, question I have is do I also need to
rebuild the previous release (i.e. libtorrent11), or can we just drop
it?
Thanks,
Chris