This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: [64bit] Problem with emacs and shared memory under X11
- From: Ken Brown <kbrown at cornell dot edu>
- To: cygwin-apps at cygwin dot com
- Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2013 13:19:18 -0400
- Subject: Re: [64bit] Problem with emacs and shared memory under X11
- References: <51D803A0 dot 7090700 at cornell dot edu> <51D82992 dot 5010402 at dronecode dot org dot uk> <51E70D37 dot 5020600 at dronecode dot org dot uk> <20130718083748 dot GA9628 at calimero dot vinschen dot de> <51E858E2 dot 7050802 at dronecode dot org dot uk> <20130718213455 dot GC30542 at calimero dot vinschen dot de> <51E91378 dot 6060402 at dronecode dot org dot uk> <20130719113509 dot GF20871 at calimero dot vinschen dot de> <51E96374 dot 4080308 at cornell dot edu> <20130719171104 dot GI20871 at calimero dot vinschen dot de>
On 7/19/2013 1:11 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Jul 19 12:04, Ken Brown wrote:
On 7/19/2013 7:35 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Jul 19 11:22, Jon TURNEY wrote:
Oh yes, that works, and is a bit clearer.
Thanks for testing. I applied the patch and attributed it to you in
the ChangeLog since you did all the work anyway.
There's still the x86 issue that I mentioned earlier. With
cygwin-1.7.21 (as well as today's snapshot), I'm getting a return
value of 0 from shmtest on x86. This is with cygserver not running.
(In fact, cygserver has never been configured on this system, so
there's no /etc/cygserver.conf). Jon reported getting a return
value of 1 using cygwin-1.7.20.
I don't recall seeing this testcase. Any chance you can extract an STC
to help fixing this? I wonder how this happened anyway. There were no
changes in terms of XSI IPC between 1.7.20 and 1.7.21, except for tiny
changes for porting to x86_64. What on earth did I screw up this
I used Jon's testcase from