This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: Please build 64 bit packages
- From: Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin at cygwin dot com>
- To: cygwin-apps at cygwin dot com
- Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 19:05:49 +0200
- Subject: Re: Please build 64 bit packages
- References: <20130725121526 dot GE5086 at calimero dot vinschen dot de> <CAGHJv4fr+gxXy0pPtw_md_cnnGLt3yJ3jG4x-KnLoK1=Eti7+A at mail dot gmail dot com> <20130725131032 dot GH5086 at calimero dot vinschen dot de> <CAGHJv4ey2CkinO0bji89Jj6zNnueaqOod4VUesN_ha_rvmgyBw at mail dot gmail dot com>
- Reply-to: cygwin-apps at cygwin dot com
On Jul 25 12:47, Chris Sutcliffe wrote:
> On 25 July 2013 09:10, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > On Jul 25 08:35, Chris Sutcliffe wrote:
> >> I still have no access to a 64-bit machine to validate any of the
> >> packages I maintain. I can cross-compile them (as I did with mksh),
> >> but I can't guarantee they work. Should I proceed?
> > No chance to install a VM?
> I tried Qemu and Virtualbox on my work supplied laptop and they both
> fail to run the x86_64 Win8 install. Unfortunately I don't have
> access to any other machine to setup a VM.
> >> > Alternatively, for those of your packages which are "noarch" packages,
> >> > for instance perl or python scripts, please drop usa note here along
> >> > the lines of "please copy package foo from 32 to 64 bit distro".
> >> I think python-gdata and googlecl fall in to this category, so please
> >> feel free to copy them over.
> > Yes, sure, that would be nice.
> Is there anything I need to do for this to happen? I can issue an RFU
> if need be...
No, I just didn't make it so far. I linked the latest versions of
both packages into the x86-64 repo now.
Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Maintainer cygwin AT cygwin DOT com