This is the mail archive of the cygwin-apps mailing list for the Cygwin project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [HEADSUP] Base category



On 12/9/2014 10:46 PM, Ken Brown wrote:
On 12/9/2014 2:52 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Dec  9 14:10, Ken Brown wrote:
On 12/9/2014 12:48 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Come to think of it.  When exactly do we want to allow installing
packages without also installing the deps?  How much sense does
this option really have?

I've had occasion to do this when testing/debugging.  And I can imagine
experienced users who correctly know that they can safely ignore some
dependencies.  So I wouldn't want it to be impossible.  But maybe we can
arrange it so that dependencies are installed by default, without a
dialog,
unless the user has explicitly requested the contrary.

For example, there could be a checkbox on an early screen saying
something
like, "For each selected package, install all of its dependencies
(RECOMMENDED)".  The box would of course be checked by default.

Apart from the Base packages thingy which was my reason to start this
thread, the dialog as such isn't bad.  It's pretty much the same thing
as on Fedora (let's say, KDE's Apper), even more detailed.

What about just not showing the "Select required packages (RECOMMEND)"
check-box, unless you use a certain command line option?

That sounds good.  Maybe --show-deps?

Ken

To me sounds wrong the concept, why we should hide this check to
the users ?
I have seen recently too many wrong dependencies pullings extra
unnecessary packages. I prefer to have users that could note the
issue and complain instead of installing "everything but the kitchen sink" behind their back.

Marco


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]