Re: setup

[Achim Gratz <Stromeko at nexgo dot de>]

Corinna Vinschen writes:
> Having said that, any more intelligent algorithm searching only where it
> actually makes sense, would be real progress.  More C than C++ wouldn't
> hurt either.

The pattern is just misapplied in this particular case, trying to take a
gatherer on a hunt.

> I'm not sure I understand what you're saying.  Setup.ini should never be
> at the local package directory level is my understanding.

Great, then I can just skip that wierdness of the old code.

> Strictly, we don't have to support updates from the old non-multi-arch
> setup anymore, therefore any top-level setup.ini can be ignored.
>
> So, from my POV, the search should ideally work like this:
>
> - Start at Local package directory.
>
> - Look if a $arch subdir exists.  If so, does it have setup.ini?
>   If so collect it and stop here.
>
> - Otherwise search all immediate subdirs.  Look if they have a
>   $arch subdir.  If so, does it have setup.ini?  If so, collect it.
>
> Does that make sense?

Yes and I just have to rip out the compat code that dealt with the other
cases.


Regards,
Achim.
-- 
+<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]>+

SD adaptations for Waldorf Q V3.00R3 and Q+ V3.54R2:
http://Synth.Stromeko.net/Downloads.html#WaldorfSDada