This is the mail archive of the
cygwin-developers@cygwin.com
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: [PATCH] performance patch for /proc/registry
On Wed, Mar 26, 2003 at 08:43:37AM -0500, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Mar 2003, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 04:08:45PM -0500, Joe Buehler wrote:
> > > $ ls -l /proc/registry
> > > total 0
> > > dr-xr--r-- 1632 Administ ???????? 0 Jul 25 1996 HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT
> > > dr-xr--r-- 2 Administ ???????? 0 Oct 10 1996 HKEY_CURRENT_CONFIG
> > > dr-x------ 8 Administ ???????? 0 Dec 5 2001 HKEY_CURRENT_USER
> > > dr-xr-xr-x 1 0 0 0 Mar 25 15:53 HKEY_DYN_DATA
> > > dr-xr-xr-- 5 Administ system 0 Mar 24 10:31 HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE
> > > dr-xr-xr-x 0 0 0 0 Dec 31 1969 HKEY_PERFOMANCE_DATA
> > > dr-xr-xr-- 3 Administ system 0 Mar 24 10:31 HKEY_USERS
> > > $
> > >
> > > Are those permissions correct? They are same as /proc/registry without
> >
> > Dunno. In RegEdit I can see the DACL, but no ownership. We have to
> > trust the values returned by the appropriate system functions I guess ;-)
> >
> > Corinna
>
> RegEdt32, Security->Permissions->Advanced->Owner (on Win2k).
> Igor
There's no RegEdt32 on XP. Regedit has taken over the job entirely.
However, I found the owner info in Regedit. It was in the obvious spot.
>From what I can tell, the above looks ok... except for the ????????.
Corinna
--
Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Developer mailto:cygwin at cygwin dot com
Red Hat, Inc.