This is the mail archive of the cygwin-developers@cygwin.com mailing list for the Cygwin project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Fixing the PROCESS_DUP_HANDLE security hole.

From: Christopher Faylor <cgf at redhat dot com>
To: cygwin-developers at cygwin dot com
Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 11:46:31 -0400
Subject: Re: Fixing the PROCESS_DUP_HANDLE security hole.
References: <3.0.5.32.20030927124303.0082f420@mail.attbi.com> <3.0.5.32.20030927124303.0082f420@mail.attbi.com> <3.0.5.32.20030927191307.0083fa50@incoming.verizon.net> <20030928012410.GB25889@redhat.com>
Reply-to: cygwin-developers at cygwin dot com

On Sat, Sep 27, 2003 at 09:24:10PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>Somehow I seem to remember that didn't work (even though I can't imagine
>why) but I wasn't clever enough to document why.  I guess it can't hurt
>to try it, advertise a snapshot, and ask for feedback.

I've checked in the ppid_handle change (attributed to Pierre) and am generating
a snapshot now.

cgf

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Fixing the PROCESS_DUP_HANDLE security hole.
  - From: Pierre A. Humblet

References:
- Fixing the PROCESS_DUP_HANDLE security hole.
  - From: Pierre A. Humblet
- Re: Fixing the PROCESS_DUP_HANDLE security hole.
  - From: Pierre A. Humblet
- Re: Fixing the PROCESS_DUP_HANDLE security hole.
  - From: Christopher Faylor

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]