This is the mail archive of the cygwin-developers@cygwin.com mailing list for the Cygwin project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [f]statvfs (was Re: bug in statfs)

From: Christopher Faylor <cgf at redhat dot com>
To: cygwin-developers at cygwin dot com
Cc: "Pierre A. Humblet" <Pierre dot Humblet at ieee dot org>,Nicholas Wourms <nwourms at netscape dot net>
Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2003 12:18:16 -0500
Subject: Re: [f]statvfs (was Re: bug in statfs)
References: <Pine.GSO.4.58.0312041101370.28297@eos> <uoeuprfyq.fsf@gnu.org> <20031204094137.GT1640@cygbert.vinschen.de> <ud6b4psjh.fsf@gnu.org> <Pine.GSO.4.58.0312041101370.28297@eos> <3.0.5.32.20031204213524.00824a30@incoming.verizon.net> <3FD0B7E0.1080600@netscape.net> <20031205171059.GG1640@cygbert.vinschen.de> <3.0.5.32.20031206120100.0082edb0@incoming.verizon.net> <20031206171611.GA7463@redhat.com>
Reply-to: cygwin-developers at cygwin dot com

On Sat, Dec 06, 2003 at 12:16:11PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>This particular problem should have been fixed in CVS around 5:29 GMT.
                                                                       2003/12/05.

References:
- [f]statvfs (was Re: bug in statfs)
  - From: Brian Ford
- Re: [f]statvfs (was Re: bug in statfs)
  - From: Pierre A. Humblet
- Re: [f]statvfs (was Re: bug in statfs)
  - From: Nicholas Wourms
- Re: [f]statvfs (was Re: bug in statfs)
  - From: Corinna Vinschen
- Re: [f]statvfs (was Re: bug in statfs)
  - From: Pierre A. Humblet
- Re: [f]statvfs (was Re: bug in statfs)
  - From: Christopher Faylor

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]