This is the mail archive of the cygwin-developers mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On 6/28/2011 21:46, Teemu NÃtkinniemi wrote: > On 28.6.2011 15:54, Eric Blake wrote: > >> In my mind, LLP64 makes absolutely zero sense. Microsoft broke lots of >> programs that previously used to assume that any pointer could be >> converted to a long and back. LP64 is the way to go for cygwin. > > If LP64 is chosen as the model then for the toolchain it might be useful > to see if Interix' GCC 4.6 and Binutils could be used as a starting > point. The sources haven't been released yet as the new GCC is still in > alpha/beta phase. > > For more information: > > http://www.suacommunity.com/forum/tm.aspx?m=19087 > > http://www.suacommunity.com/forum/tm.aspx?m=18858 > > Teemu > OK, who wants to start on LP64 for x86_64-pc-cygwin on trunk GCC? :) I suppose the binutils part would be exactly similar to mingw-w64's? Just need some more bits to recognize the new triplet.
Attachment:
0xED74C077.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |