This is the mail archive of the cygwin-developers mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On 19 February 2013 09:20, Corinna Vinschen wrote:On Feb 18 10:07, Corinna Vinschen wrote:On Feb 17 21:32, Andy Koppe wrote:I've also tried ye olde date fork benchmark (`while true; do date; done | uniq -c`), on a Windows 8-64 laptop: I got 26 dates per second with 32-bit Cygwin, but 50 with 64-bit Cygwin, so that's looking quite promising.
Sounds good. I just hope it's not only a side-effect of some bug still lurking in Cygwin :}
Did you test dash vs. bash by any chance?
You're right, I did.
If so, bash is rather slow compared to dash. On my 2008R2 testmachine I tested the above date loop in dash, and I get 45 with Cygwin 1.7.17 (35 with bash), and 58+ with the 64 bit DLL, so that's about 28% faster.
Retesting with the latest stuff I got 47 vs 34 in dash (+38%), and 39 vs 26 in bash (+50%).
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |