Re: Who hasn't been badly flamed?

[Christopher Faylor <cgf-no-personal-reply-please at cygwin dot com>]

On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 09:06:01PM -0500, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
> From: Christopher Faylor
>>Yes, once I got your drift I realized that there is no way you would
>>ever admit to having "flamed" anyone.  Hence my real embarrassment for
>>assuming that you would even indirectly take responsibility for
>>something like that.
>
>Ok Chris, I'll ask you this yet again: Please point out an instance of
>where I have "flamed" you, so that I may apologize, and we can both put
>the terrible tragedy behind us.  Please again note that taking you to
>task for poor behavior (or even what you would term "trolling") is not
>a "flame" by anybody's definition.

You know, on rereading, I suppose I was a little too forthcoming about
my assessment of your personality and I should have just left well
enough alone.

I certainly can't apologize for having opinions about you but I do
apologize for making them public.  I should have just let you have the
last word.

For the record, yes, I do think that you have flamed but I don't require
an apology.

>BTW: Was your post an example of "trolling" (your definition)?  I don't
>seem to see any vituperative lanuguage per se.

Argh.  Did I forget to use a smiley?  How could I have been so careless?

;-) ;-) ;-)

cgf