This is the mail archive of the
cygwin-talk
mailing list for the cygwin project.
Re: Who hasn't been badly flamed?
- From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-no-personal-reply-please at cygwin dot com>
- To: The Cygwin-Talk Malingering List <cygwin-talk at cygwin dot com>
- Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2005 21:29:59 -0400
- Subject: Re: Who hasn't been badly flamed?
- References: <NUTMEGTkUD5euwdUTaG00000cb3@NUTMEG.CAM.ARTIMI.COM> <SERRANOyPmBIzJ9skB4000002d4@SERRANO.CAM.ARTIMI.COM>
- Reply-to: The Cygwin-Talk Malingering List <cygwin-talk at cygwin dot com>
- Reply-to: cygwin-talk at cygwin dot com
On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 01:54:53AM +0100, Dave Korn wrote:
>----Original Message----
>>From: Gary R. Van Sickle
>>Sent: 12 September 2005 00:11
>
>> Did you miss this part sir?:
>>
>> "Please point out an instance of where I have "flamed" you, so that I may
>> apologize, and we can both put the terrible tragedy behind us."
>>
>> If it's "flame", let's put it out. If it ain't, let's stop the false
>> accusations, huh?
>>
>>> Instead, I invite you to privately reread all your messages
>>> criticising others and reflect upon them.
>>
>> No, you're the one doing the accusing, it's your job to do the legwork.
>> If indeed there are "all [these] messages criticising others" flowing
>> from me,
>> it should surely be trivial to find just one example that's a "flame" in
>> the archives, should it not?
>
>
> Hahaaa! Classic old UPA technique: demand proof from someone that you
>have flamed them (or someone else), wait for them to go off, dig up and post
>a few google groups links to your old material, then the minute they do
>start pointing and laughing at them and jumping up and down going "haha I
>t0rlled j00 into googlestalking me fanboi!". <nostalgic sigh> It's just
>like Usenet circa 1997 all over again.
UPA? Ukrainian Planetariums Association? Unauthorized Precedence Announcement?
Utah Psychological Association?
cgf