RE: -mno-cygwin, huh?, wha? [RE: Pbm with ar.h when compiling make-3.80 for mingw]

["Dave Korn" <dave dot korn at artimi dot com>]

On 15 February 2006 19:35, Christopher Faylor wrote:

> On Wed, Feb 15, 2006 at 07:31:38PM -0000, Dave Korn wrote:
>> On 15 February 2006 19:27, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>> Thanks, Dave, for your continued vigilance.
>>> 
>>> Is there something (besides hippos) in the water or something?  We seem
>>> to be getting an increased number of non-cygwin "problem reports"
>>> recently.
>> 
>> 
>> Yeh, I've noticed, the situation looks real bad.
>> 
>> In fact you might even say it mings!
> 
> I wonder if it would matters at all if we just got rid of the
> -mno-cygwin option entirely.  I don't mind making a mingw
> "cross-compiler" part of the requirement for building cygwin and maybe
> it would make the issue really clear.
> 
> cgf


  Nah, let's just hide it.  Rename it
"-mno-cygwin-but-i-would-like-a-hippo-please-and-can-i-have-that-with-cheese-t
o-go-and-by-the-way-i-really-promise-not-to-mail-the-cygwin-list-with-any-supp
ort-request-as-a-result-of-doing-whatever-it-is-i'm-doing-right-now".


    cheers,
      DaveK
-- 
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....