This is the mail archive of the
cygwin-talk
mailing list for the cygwin project.
Re: MVFS results
- From: Dave Korn <dave dot korn dot cygwin at googlemail dot com>
- To: "The Vulger And Sarcastic And Contemptuous *And* Unprofessional Cygwin-Talk Maiming... oh, you know the routine" <cygwin-talk at cygwin dot com>
- Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 01:56:32 +0100
- Subject: Re: MVFS results
- References: <loom.20090715T192219-408@post.gmane.org> <20090715204831.GA27613@calimero.vinschen.de> <loom.20090715T213245-387@post.gmane.org> <20090716090703.GH27613@calimero.vinschen.de> <h3mrap$f0n$1@ger.gmane.org> <20090716094505.GJ27613@calimero.vinschen.de> <4A5EFC69.10408@gmail.com> <4A5F0EDF.3050304@gmail.com> <20090717003204.GA29766@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
- Reply-to: The Vulgar and Unprofessional Cygwin-Talk List <cygwin-talk at cygwin dot com>
Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 12:28:31PM +0100, Dave Korn wrote:
>> Dave Korn wrote:
>>> [nonsense]
>> Bah, wrong list, sorry.
>
> It really is ok to be humorous in the Cygwin list.
I know, but I wouldn't have bothered with a silly "To:" line if I had meant
to send it there!
> Or do I mean contemptuously sarcastic? Hmm. Come to think of it there
> obviously is no difference.
Say, is that commutative? I just wondered which would be worse:
contemptuous sarcasm, or sarcastic contempt.
Oh wait! I could be facetious too!
cheers,
DaveK