This is the mail archive of the
cygwin-xfree@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
RE: Installation How-To Draft
- To: cygwin-xfree at sources dot redhat dot com
- Subject: RE: Installation How-To Draft
- From: Olivier Jacquemin <Olivier dot Jacquemin at DialogSystems dot be>
- Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2000 09:42:04 +0200
Hello,
ntsec is the origin. On my installation the CYGWIN environment variable is
set to
ntsec binmode tty
If I do 'export CYGWIN='
and then remove the /usr/X11R6/ directory and untar the X packages again,
then xfree starts correctly. At this moment, 'ls -l *.dll' gives
-rw-r--r-- 1 oja None 72704 Jul 16 19:30 libICE.dll
-rw-r--r-- 1 oja None 203776 Jul 16 19:30 libPEX5.dll
-rw-r--r-- 1 oja None 29184 Jul 16 19:30 libSM.dll
-rw-r--r-- 1 oja None 726528 Jul 16 19:30 libX11.dll
Afterward if I type
export CYGWIN='ntsec binmode tty'
then X starts correctly again, but 'ls -l *.dll' gives (without any use of
chmod)
-rwxr-xr-x 1 administ None 72704 Jul 16 19:30 libICE.dll*
-rwxr-xr-x 1 administ None 203776 Jul 16 19:30 libPEX5.dll*
-rwxr-xr-x 1 administ None 29184 Jul 16 19:30 libSM.dll*
-rwxr-xr-x 1 administ None 726528 Jul 16 19:30 libX11.dll*
The least I can say is that I don't understand this fully.
_Olivier_
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Robert Collins [SMTP:robert.collins@itdomain.com.au]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2000 11:51 PM
> To: Chris Faylor; cygwin-xfree@sources.redhat.com
> Cc: Olivier.Jacquemin@DialogSystems.be
> Subject: Re: Installation How-To Draft
>
> I use cygwin=ntsec,
> when I reinstalled the entire cygwin suite I got c0000022 errors in perl,
> and
> when I upgraded to the current X binaries I recieved the same error for
> Xwin
> etc.. I didn't fix the issue with perl - but I was apparently searching
> the
> wrong list archive - as the chmod o+x,g+x,u+x *.dll cmd did fix it for me.
>
> I suspect there is a problem untarring or setting x when cygwin=ntsec.
>
> I don't use cygwin=ntsec at the office, and I had no problems there.
>
> Rob
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Chris Faylor" <cgf@cygnus.com>
> To: <cygwin-xfree@sources.redhat.com>
> Cc: <Olivier.Jacquemin@DialogSystems.be>
> Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2000 7:15 AM
> Subject: Re: Installation How-To Draft
>
>
> > On Tue, Sep 12, 2000 at 05:51:15PM +0200, Olivier Jacquemin wrote:
> > >Harold,
> > >
> > >My PC is part of a domain. I am also part of the Administrators group
> of
> my
> > >machine.
> > >
> > >An 'ls -l *.dll' gives the following result if I do it just after
> > >un-tarring:
> > >-rw-r--r-- 1 oja None 72704 Jul 16 19:30 libICE.dll
> > >-rw-r--r-- 1 oja None 203776 Jul 16 19:30 libPEX5.dll
> > >-rw-r--r-- 1 oja None 29184 Jul 16 19:30 libSM.dll
> > >
> > >An important difference with your result is that the owner is myself
> instead
> > >of "administ". This is due to the fact that my bash prompt is
> "oja@Pc_oja"
> > >instead of "administrator@Pc_oja" (and I don't remember how to change
> this).
> > >
> > >Now I have reduced the necessary command for correct initialization of
> X
> to
> > >'chmod u+x *.dll'
> > >Of course, I can get the same result by adding "Execute (X)" permission
> for
> > >user OJA on all these files using the GUI of Win NT.
> > >
> > >I hope you will find this information useful.
> >
> > What Cygwin options are you using?
> >
> > As I've previously indicated, 'chmod u+x' really should only has meaning
> to
> > Cygwin and only if you are using a specific option in the Cygwin
> > environment variable.
> >
> > cgf
> >