This is the mail archive of the
cygwin-xfree@cygwin.com
mailing list for the Cygwin XFree86 project.
RE: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Shadow Framebuffer Test 12
- To: "Cygx (E-mail)" <cygwin-xfree at sources dot redhat dot com>
- Subject: RE: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Shadow Framebuffer Test 12
- From: Suhaib Siddiqi <ssiddiqi at inspirepharm dot com>
- Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2001 06:42:22 -0500
>> I have a couple of other programs which install and use their
> own version of
> the cygwin DLL but,
What do you mean by __Use their own version of Cygwin1.dll__?????
You should never have multiple Cygwin1.dll on the same system.
Suhaib
> to my recollection, none of these were
> installed after
> XWin. I am currently checking my paths and eliminating the
> others in turn
> but would be interested to hear if there are any other
> potential causes of
> this problem (previous test builds worked okay BTW)
>
> Martin
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Harold Hunt [mailto:huntharo@msu.edu]
> Sent: 29 March 2001 02:41
> To: Cygx (E-mail)
> Subject: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Shadow Framebuffer Test 12
>
>
> I just posted Test 12 to my usual announcement page:
> http://www.msu.edu/~huntharo/xwin/shadow/
>
> Test 12 is compiled with the Cygwin/XFree86 4.0.3 source
> code; you must have
> Cygwin/XFree86 4.0.3 installed before you install Test 12.
>
> Changes:
> 1) A great developer (John Fortin) once told me that
> the DDLOCK_NOSYSLOCK flag for IDirectDrawSurface_Lock
> was not introduced until DirectDraw4, which is not
> available for Windows NT 4.0. Including that flag
> causes the surface lock to fail on NT 4.0. I removed
> the flag from all calls to IDirectDrawSurface_Lock.
>
> Please report to the list if you are running Windows NT 4.0
> and you can run
> this test but you could not run previous tests.
>
> Harold Hunt
>